Skip to main content
← Back to Blog
SecuritySECURITY

Our SOC 2 Journey: Lessons Learned Building FormaOS

An inside look at how we aligned to SOC 2 controls, what we prioritized, where we struggled, and how we built repeatable evidence along the way.

Engineering Team
November 22, 2025
9 min read

Our SOC 2 Journey: Lessons Learned Building FormaOS

Scope, timeline, and expectations

We scoped our initial SOC 2 alignment effort to the Security and Availability trust services criteria.

The goal was a timeline we could actually hit without disrupting delivery.

The biggest challenge was not documentation. It was proving ongoing control execution with verifiable evidence.

The gaps we discovered

We realized the gap was operational. Our policies were sound, but the evidence trail was fragmented.

  • Inconsistent access reviews across teams
  • Vendor risk assessments stored in multiple tools
  • Evidence captured after the fact rather than inline

Our remediation plan

We treated remediation like compliance automation work, not a documentation sprint. Each step needed clear ownership and evidence.

  1. Centralize controls in a single taxonomy.
  2. Assign clear owners and define evidence requirements.
  3. Automate evidence capture from core systems.
  4. Run weekly control health reviews and log exceptions.
  5. Test audit reports quarterly to validate integrity.

Evidence automation wins

Automated evidence capture reduced manual effort and gave auditors a clear trail of accountability.

  • Automated access review evidence from identity systems
  • Deployment approvals captured from CI/CD workflows
  • Immutable logs for key control events

Takeaways for teams starting SOC 2 alignment

Treat SOC 2 as an operating system, not a once-a-year project.

Build evidence capture into everyday workflows, keep ownership explicit, and use RBAC governance to protect control changes.

Ready to operationalize compliance?

See how FormaOS connects controls, evidence, and teams in one platform.